|
Post by jfc on Dec 12, 2007 10:32:59 GMT
Is there a rule of thumb for a nest of tables Height and width etc ?
|
|
|
Post by jake on Dec 12, 2007 10:53:52 GMT
Yes, each has to be a little less tall than the previous one, by the thickness of the top and the height of the rails and a little spare, and a little less wide in at least one direction.
I hope that helps.
|
|
|
Post by engineerone on Dec 12, 2007 11:00:38 GMT
depends on where it is going i think. somewhere about 500 high for the top one in many cases, although i have used as much as 600 for a side table. as for the tops start at about 500 square, and go down. although old fashioned ones are about 450x 300 a lot depend on what you are doing in terms of legs and supports. so another one for next weekend then ;D ;D paul
|
|
|
Post by Scrit on Dec 12, 2007 11:28:51 GMT
I don't think so. Surely you want the average table height to be somewhere around that of a coffee table, say 16in/400mm as the height of the middle table in the set (for use with a modern settee, traditional wing back settees have a higher seat and will need a correspondingly higher table top height). Normally that's the height of the tallest table but if you go that way then the smallest table will be ruddy uncomfortable to use. It also depends on whether or not the tables are maent to be set in front of the chair/settee or whether or not they are required as side tables - if the latter then the height will need to be approaching the height of the chair arm. Top sizes? 12 to 16 in x 10 to 14in. There's no real rule for that, other than considering the weight of the set as a whole I'd day
Scrit
|
|
|
Post by dom on Dec 12, 2007 16:41:29 GMT
Those I have made vary greatly. But usually they start at 580 mm and then downwards incrementally. They are made for when guest arrive so the middle and last sizes are irrelevant, the tallest needs to be practical an if it sits next to an armchair then 550-580 is a good height
|
|
|
Post by wizer on Dec 12, 2007 17:04:26 GMT
does anyone really use nested tables? I've never seen them in use (other than the largest one)
|
|
|
Post by nickw on Dec 12, 2007 17:25:00 GMT
Yes, thank you.
|
|
|
Post by paulchapman on Dec 12, 2007 17:43:14 GMT
does anyone really use nested tables? I wish they would - rather than putting their drinks on the arm of the chair and knocking them over
|
|
|
Post by engineerone on Dec 12, 2007 17:54:22 GMT
i inherited two sets and that is where i got some of my dimensions from. one is a reproset with glass tops, they start at 550 to the top which is 400x300, in this case there is a top rail to consider which moves it down about 75 to the next one. they slide underneath each other, with four legs and no front rail on the top two. the other set is more modern in design starting at 520 high, and 600 x450 with no rails, just single end legs which are one piece, and joined by a mid rail at about 200 high this is curved to allow the tables to set flush against each other. another idea i have seen is a a 3 piece which has a half round top and then two quarter tables which slide along, and are all level with each other. this saves a bunch of space, andis quite a neat solution. so do we get a wip before xmas then mate as for paul chapman, why not put polishon the arms and they would slide off as they put it down ;D paul
|
|
|
Post by jfc on Dec 12, 2007 21:06:51 GMT
You may well see some mate as my Mum said last year that this Would be nice as a nest of tables . Not sure im going to have the time but if i do i'll make them for her .
|
|