|
Doors
Jun 26, 2008 8:48:55 GMT
Post by jake on Jun 26, 2008 8:48:55 GMT
Neutral question - what do those who make doors and windows make of this set of doors, and particularly the section of the glazing bars? The brief was as close to a pair of 4-light Victorian french doors as possible - those have standard sash window sized glazing bars - but they are narrower (hence 4 rather than 8 light) and obviously do not have to carry double glazing units. Timber is iroko.
|
|
|
Doors
Jun 26, 2008 11:56:52 GMT
Post by mrgrimsdale on Jun 26, 2008 11:56:52 GMT
Neutral question - what do those who make doors and windows make of this set of doors, and particularly the section of the glazing bars? The brief was as close to a pair of 4-light Victorian french doors as possible - those have standard sash window sized glazing bars - but they are narrower (hence 4 rather than 8 light) and obviously do not have to carry double glazing units. Timber is iroko. Don't in any way look even vaguely like a pair of victorian 4 light french doors, or have I missed something? brief was as close to a pair of 4-light Victorian french doors as possible: what's wrong with exact replica of ditto, that's as close as possible isn't it? NB there are no standard glazing bars in Victorian joinery, in the modern sense. You get a a wide variety general designs repeated a lot, but rarely identical when you compare them. Most characteristic is how thin they are, down to 12mm even. 14, 15 mm common with tiny glazing rebates, 5mm max. cheers Jacob
|
|
|
Doors
Jun 26, 2008 12:12:16 GMT
Post by jake on Jun 26, 2008 12:12:16 GMT
Sorry, my sentence was misleading. Facing on to the same patio we have another set of 4-light (per leaf) original victorian french doors - the opening there is much narrower, so they are four light. This opening is much wider, so they had to be 8 light (to keep the panes rectangular and in the right orientation).
The originals have typically slim victorian bars, (say 20mm max).
These are obviously massive by comparison. I understand it is impossible to have them as slim as the originals, because the BCO is insisting on 24mm DG (and I hadn't clocked onto the argon fill/wotsit glass at the time it was specified).
What I want to know is whether (given the 24mm dg units) they are as slim as sensibly possible.
I have my own view, obviously.
|
|
|
Doors
Jun 26, 2008 12:30:17 GMT
Post by mrgrimsdale on Jun 26, 2008 12:30:17 GMT
I get asked a lot if I can do DG windows, or doors like yours, which will look Victorian, and I always say: no it's not possible. It's as simple as that. And I wouldn't use iroko or any hardwood for a painted door - complete waste of wood, and pine is far better and more durable if painted. I learnt early on that these sorts of compromise are a problem and life became much simpler when I decided on a purist perfect replica approach, no DG, no hardwood, replica details and design etc. Sorry not much help, I guess these are your doors and you have an unhappy client cheers Jacob
|
|
cadas
Full Member
Posts: 107
|
Doors
Jun 26, 2008 17:27:56 GMT
Post by cadas on Jun 26, 2008 17:27:56 GMT
I make quite few like this but there are only two options, one is for planted on glazing bars which can be as thin as you like.
Alternatively, I make the door slightly thicker and taper( using a moulding) the glazing bar so it has more depth and looks thinner.
With victorian glazing bars , the look comes from both the narrowness of the bar, but also the depth. In the picture, your windows look full of glass, there is no depth. On a victorian window the glass is set back
|
|
|
Doors
Jun 26, 2008 17:52:52 GMT
Post by jake on Jun 26, 2008 17:52:52 GMT
That's the outside - they are deeper in section to give a good moulding depth on the inside.
|
|
|
Doors
Jun 26, 2008 22:10:17 GMT
Post by jfc on Jun 26, 2008 22:10:17 GMT
Sorry Jake but no way around it as far as i can see . The glazing bars look big and ugly but it's the only way to actually get any kind of strength to hold the glass and pin a bead on . I can send you a small sample of the moulding i use if you want to compare it but i think you will find it is the same size . Are these internal doors ?
|
|
|
Doors
Jun 26, 2008 22:28:11 GMT
Post by jake on Jun 26, 2008 22:28:11 GMT
External.
I've warmed to them since first seeing that photo last night - and I reckon they'll look better from the other side (which is more important).
|
|
|
Doors
Jun 26, 2008 22:37:39 GMT
Post by jfc on Jun 26, 2008 22:37:39 GMT
Easy to pick holes in someone elses work i know but the bottom rail is a bit small for trad joinery . Also the thickness of the frame is a bit small and the cill section . Of course it's not trad joinery and whoever made them had to deal with all the modern bullshit ...... i mean regs ;D
|
|