|
Post by modernist on Nov 3, 2008 22:05:44 GMT
I am making some fairly straightforward if heavy duty workshop cabinets to hold ginders and a mill drill with drawers below.
Construtuction is post and rail with offset over and under tenons into the posts and the posts and rails grooved to take rebated glued mdf panels for strength.
The front rails are not grooved owing to the drawers.
This lot, although simple, makes 16 rails with different combinations of offset tenon, groove and over or under which got fairly confusing when they were all in a pile awaiting machining.
Is there a standard way of marking such components to avoid mistakes to identify their position at least, short of marking each one out seperately?
Brian
|
|
|
Post by jfc on Nov 3, 2008 22:38:01 GMT
Do you meen 16 batches or 16 singles ? In any case i number them . If 16 batches each batch gets put together and a line struck across them . If 16 different parts i number each male and female joint .
|
|
|
Post by engineerone on Nov 3, 2008 22:39:06 GMT
you know brian you have opened a can of worms for which we must endure a jacob talk about rods actually in this case, the rod does seem the most sensible method of ensuring accuracy. having made mistakes myself, i think the other important thing is to mark the pieces properly and keep to the system. however, this can later cause problems if you wish to finish before gluing up one thing i have learnt is to mark on the ends of for instance the tenons, whilst if possible make a similar mark around the mortice. since i have used shouldered tenons, i find this quite useful. paul
|
|
|
Post by modernist on Nov 3, 2008 23:30:54 GMT
It's just two units with 16 rails but I now realise they are all different owing to the offset tenons and higher top shoulder on the upper rails to leave longer grain in the post. Having been persuaded by the arguements here I did use a rod for the first time and it was really good for lengths and shoulders etc but didn't help when it came to over and under tenon cut offs (which is where I went wrong) perhaps I haven't fully sussed the "rod" yet. I'll do a few pics tomorrow to illustrate the problem. Brian PS to Mods I'd written much more than this but answered a pm flag which wiped out my musings We need a save to draft auto option
|
|
|
Post by mrgrimsdale on Nov 3, 2008 23:36:14 GMT
Yep - afraid so it does sound like a suitable case for a rod . "Spare the rod..." etc And systematic face and edge marks, depending on the design i.e. all stiles and rails having edge/face marks facing in, or not, as appropriate. cheers Jacob PS The face and edge marks are an essential part of the system i.e. gets the components oriented in a systematic way
|
|
|
Post by modernist on Nov 3, 2008 23:41:12 GMT
I was wondering if there was a standard system like the triangle for frames which could be applied to framed and panelled carcasses?
Brian
|
|
|
Post by mrgrimsdale on Nov 3, 2008 23:48:06 GMT
Rod + face and edge marks is the standard system.
|
|
|
Post by jfc on Nov 4, 2008 0:00:35 GMT
So you only need four or eight with different offset shoulders ? Then just mark those . Woodwork is simple , why over complicate things .
|
|